Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://mypepack.gophersport.com/video/?vid=IEDzZ1XBiWa Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Jury Goes Inside the Clancy Home - Why the Defense Didnt Fight It (Lindsay Clancy Trial Day 4) [yooK5p9O96x] Health Updated on August 08, 2026 EDT — Published on August 08, 2026 EDT Lawyer Lee recaps Day 4 of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. The jury visited the home where Patrick and Lindsay Clancy lived with their three children. The two sides continue to fight over what the blood evidence means. Lindsay Clancy is charged with murder in the deaths of her three children. She says she is not criminally responsible under Massachusetts law. ******* I have a brand-new podcast !! ******** Check it out at: Enjoying the content? Join us by becoming a channel member! Venmo: @LawyerLeeW PayPal: @LawyerLeeW TWITTER: LawyerLeeW MODERATORS: Many thanks to marlonmaastricht and mamapinks, the best mods anywhere. OUTRO: by MarlonMaastricht All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). LawFiROxenj 5L9aNR5wcxP Lm3yZ08yd1c j5lsfY2DfFf fZrB6lfv5sU LIuE0e06SCK
Lawyer Lee recaps Day 4 of the Lindsay Clancy murder trial. The jury visited the home where Patrick and Lindsay Clancy lived with their three children. The two sides continue to fight over what the blood evidence means. Lindsay Clancy is charged with murder in the deaths of her three children. She says she is not criminally responsible under Massachusetts law. ******* I have a brand-new podcast !! ******** Check it out at: Enjoying the content? Join us by becoming a channel member! Venmo: @LawyerLeeW PayPal: @LawyerLeeW TWITTER: LawyerLeeW MODERATORS: Many thanks to marlonmaastricht and mamapinks, the best mods anywhere. OUTRO: by MarlonMaastricht All non-licensed clips used for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). LawFiROxenj 5L9aNR5wcxP Lm3yZ08yd1c j5lsfY2DfFf fZrB6lfv5sU LIuE0e06SCK